Risk First, but Not Pain First

At our company, we have an approach to project management that we call “risk first”. It means that we try to solve the hardest problems very early during development, so that we don’t fall into the “effort spent, but no real progress” trap.

One thing I want to add to my blog entry from 2018 (linked above) is that “risk” should not be conflated with “pain”. I mention it because the distinction wasn’t clear to me until recently. I try to explain what I mean.

When you approach a project in a “risk first” manner, it doesn’t feel good for quite a time. You try to stay ahead of the problem that seems overwhelming if the project isn’t trivial. Tackling the risk evokes feelings of uncertainty, doubt and even frustration. But it doesn’t hurt.

Feeling “pain” in a project has another origin. I managed several projects at once that were painful: The customers were difficult, erratic or not within reach. The requirements were unclear. My assessment was that the projects themselves are risky and every task I began had the properties of a risky task, too. But because the customers couldn’t support my work on the tasks, I made near to no progress and often had to backtrack. The tasks became more riskier the more I worked on them.

My insight was that most of my work schedule revolved around cycling through the painful projects that I wrongly classified as risky and working on their tasks that made no real progress. Hopping from painful task to painful task doesn’t feel good at all. And because the cycle of “stuck” projects is so prominent, it eclipses the lower risk projects with more relaxed deadlines and unstressed customers.

My current remedy is to budget for a maximum amount of pain per period. Each painful project only gets carefully limited attention and is alleviated by lower-risk work in more painfree projects. With this approach, there is progress in most projects and my project management focus isn’t locked on the stuck projects. You can say that I take “time off” from the more stressful situations.

I found myself in this trap because I couldn’t properly distinguish between “risk” and “pain”. Both don’t feel good, but you can work on the first with attention and effort. The level of pain in a project is nearly unswayable by your actions. You can only control your level of exposure to it.

This is where I hope for your thoughts:

  • Can you follow my distinction between “risk” and “pain”?
  • What are your indications that a task is “painful”?
  • Have you found means to decrease the level of pain in a project?

Write us a comment or even your own blog entry on the topic!