Nowadays we developers tend to stand on the shoulders of giants: We put powerful building-blocks from different libraries together to build something worth man-years in hours. Or we fill-in the missing pieces in a framework infrastructure to create a complete application in just a few days.
While it is great to have such tools in the form of application programmer interfaces (API) at your disposal it is hard to build high quality APIs. There are many examples for widely used APIs, good and bad. What does “bad API” mean? It depends on your view point:
Bad API for the API user
For the application programmer a bad API means things like:
- Simple tasks/use cases are complicated
- Complex tasks are impossible or require patching
- Easy to misuse producing bugs
A very simple real life example of such an API is a C++ camera API I had to use in a project. Our users were able to change the area of interest (AOI) of the picture to produce images consisting of only a part of full resolution images. Our application did crash or not work as expected without obvious reasons. It took many hours of debugging to spot the subtle API misuse that could be verified be reading the documentation:
The value of camera.Width.GetMax()
changed instead of being constant! The reason is that AOI was meant and not the sensor resolution width. The full resolution width we actually wanted is obtained by calling camera.WidthMax.GetValue()
. This kind of naming makes the properties almost undistinguishable and communicates nothing of the implications. Terms like AOI or sensor width or full resolution just do not appear in this part of the API.
Small things like the example above may really hurt productivity and user experience of an API.
Bad API for the API programmer
API programmers can easily produce APIs that are bad for themselves because they take away too much freedom away resulting in:
- Frequent breaking changes
- API rewrites
- Unimplementable features
- Confusing, not fitting interfaces
Design your interfaces small and focused. Use types in the interface that leave as much freedom as possible without hurting usability (see Iterable vs. Collection vs. List vs. ArrayList for example). Try to build composable and extendable types because adding types or methods is less of a problem than changing them.
Conclusion
Developers should put extra care in interfaces they want to publish for others to use. Once the API is out there breaking it means angry users. Be aware that good API design is hard and necessary for a painless evolution of an API. Consider reading books like “Practical API Design” or “Build APIs You Won’t Hate” if you want to target a wider audience.