Tag: dependencies

Automated vulnerability checking of software dependencies

The OWASP organization is focused on improving the security of software systems and regularly publishes lists with security risks, such as the OWASP Top 10 Most Critical Web Application Security Risks or the Mobile Top 10 Security Risks. Among these are common attack vectors like command injections, buffer overruns, stack buffer overflow attacks and SQL injections.

When developing software you have to be aware of these in order to avoid and prevent them. If your project depends on third-party software components, such as open source libraries, you have to assess those dependencies for security risks as well. It is not enough to do this just once. You have to check them regularly and watch for any known, publicly disclosed, vulnerabilities in these dependencies.

Publicly known information-security vulnerabilities are tracked according to the Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVE) standard. Each vulnerability is assigned an ID, for example CVE-2009-2704, and published in the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) by the U.S. government. Here’s an example for such an entry.

Automated Dependency Checking

There are tools and services to automatically check the dependencies of your project against these publicly known vulnerabilities, for example the OWASP Dependency Check or the Sonatype OSS Index. In order to use them your project has to use a dependency manager, for example Maven in the Java world or NuGet in the .NET ecosystem.

Here’s how to integrate the OWASP Dependency Check into your Maven based project, by adding the following plugin to the pom.xml file:

<plugin>
  <groupId>org.owasp</groupId>
  <artifactId>dependency-check-maven</artifactId>
  <version>5.0.0-M1</version>
  <executions>
    <execution>
      <goals>
        <goal>check</goal>
      </goals>
    </execution>
  </executions>
</plugin>

When you run the Maven goal dependency-check:check you might see an output like this:

One or more dependencies were identified with known vulnerabilities in Project XYZ:

jboss-j2eemgmt-api_1.1_spec-1.0.1.Final.jar (pkg:maven/org.jboss.spec.javax.management.j2ee/jboss-j2eemgmt-api_1.1_spec@1.0.1.Final, cpe:2.3:a:sun:j2ee:1.0.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*) : CVE-2009-2704, CVE-2009-2705
...

The output tells you which version of a dependency is affected and the CVE ID. Now you can use this ID to look it up in the NVD database and inform yourself about the potential dangers of the vulnerability and take action, like updating the dependency if there is a newer version, which addresses the vulnerability.

Client-side web development: Drink the Kool-Aid or be cautious?

Client side web development is a fast-changing world. JavaScript libraries and frameworks come and go monthly. A couple of years ago jQuery was a huge thing, then AngularJS, and nowadays people use React or Vue.js with a state container like Redux. And so do we for new projects. Unfortunately, these modern client-side frameworks are based on the npm ecosystem, which is notoriously known for its dependency bloat. Even if you only have a couple of direct dependencies the package manager lock file will list hundreds of indirect dependencies. Experience has shown that lots of dependencies will result in a maintenance burden as time passes, especially when you have to do major version updates. Also, as mentioned above, frameworks come and then go out of fashion, and the maintainers of a framework move on to their next big thing pet project, leaving you and your project sitting on a barely or no longer maintained base, and frameworks can’t be easily replaced, because they tend to permeate every aspect of your application.

With this frustrating experience in mind we recently did an experiment for a new medium sized web project. We avoided frameworks and the npm ecosystem and only used JavaScript libraries with no or very few indirect dependencies, which really were necessary. Browsers have become better at being compatible to web standards, at least regarding the basics. Libraries like jQuery and poly-fills that paper over the incompatibilities can mostly be avoided — an interesting resource is the website You Might Not Need jQuery.

We still organised our views as components, and they are communicating via a very simple event dispatcher. Some things had to be done by foot, but not too much. It works, although the result is not as pure as it would have been with declarative views as facilitated by React and a functional state container like Redux. We’re still fans of the React+Redux approach and we’re using it happily (at least for now) for other projects, but we’re also skeptical regarding the long term costs, especially from relying on the npm ecosystem. Which approach will result in less maintenance burden? We don’t know yet. Time will tell.